D'OH!
I sometimes think that iI've never actually THOUGHT about anything my whole life, up to a year or two ago.
so i'm reading another carl sagan book and he seems to invariably find a way to slam j-dubs in each one.
(i can't say i blame him.).
anyway, in this one he discusses the fact that the gospels give contradictory geneologies of jesus--differing lines back to david from joseph, and a different number of generations.
D'OH!
I sometimes think that iI've never actually THOUGHT about anything my whole life, up to a year or two ago.
ive pasted the following from a uk xjw facebook page.:.
i found out last night that thursday,just gone, a member of the gb came to rosehill congregation in bolton to tell them the gb will now be more active and a more prominent part of their lives, this is to build trust and make it so when they revel new direction in the future, people don't push against them and they follow them.
it's a long shot shot but what are the chances he will be at any other meeting in this district this sunday and how can i find out?.
Dibnah. Proper hero!
while i'm glad i found this site, it has also crumbled to bits everything i've believed in my whole life.
i feel like the certainty, magic and wonder has gone out of my life.
this has left a huge hole in my soul.
Crumbling worlds eh? Know what that feels like.
Still having to live in mine, whilst pretending all is well.
Sucky.
i haven't come across any arguement that does not involve secular history and external references.
in fact the wt can not get to 607 bce without using external sources as in knowing that they need to get back from 1914 ce to 607 bce, and botching an argument using an external date as reference to create their start point at 537 bce.. i realize that to get the final date we must provide a fixed figure from somewhere which can only be a historical source, but the objective would be to disprove the wt flim flam.
once that is achieve we can use which ever fixed historical point they wish to chose.
Marky mark and the funky bunch
i know this has been dished over before, but when i was doing some research i discovered a couple of interesting points.
as far as i can find, there is only one wt article that implies that jw men should not have beards.
*** w75 8/15 pp.
Good for you cap'n, my flourishing facial hair is definitely getting on people's nerves at the hall! Love it!
Had a study cone up to me the other day saying that 'you don't get many brothers in the truth with a beard, but it suits you', I was ready to launch into a tirade about the stigma and unwritten rules but too many people were nearby... I chickened out and hid inside my beard.
this message is especially for frenchspeaking people :.
yesterday august 7th was officially released the first volume of the highly anticipated french comic masturbin & clitorine (very funny names impossible to translate in english, and stories are even more hilarious).
some artworks had been uploaded on facebook several months ago, and now it's available !
Dammit! Wish I'd paid attention to French at school now...
Zut alors!
new article:.
http://ajwrb.org/science/the-watchtower-on-albumin.
lee.
Helpful stuff, nice and clear, thanks for posting...
is it just me or have they modelled 'joseph in the prison hole' on cedars and added a homoerotic element to it?
.
Thanks oub, I was actually kidding about them modelling the pic on cedars, but I do think there's a likeness..
pattern of excuses.
" zion's watch tower 1894 jul 15 p.226.
(compare isaiah 8:11-13.
Very well presented. Thanks!
is it just me or have they modelled 'joseph in the prison hole' on cedars and added a homoerotic element to it?
.
Hahaa dammit!